RSI is proud to announce the relaunch of www.rsuitecms.com, a website which provides details on our three new licensing models.

These three licensing models, called "editions", will make RSuite available to publishers of any size, as well as other industries. The new editions are: RSuite CMS Team Edition (TE), RSuite CMS Standard Edition (SE), and RSuite CMS Enterprise Edition (EE). 

Find out which edition is right for you:

RSuite CMS Team Edition (TE)

RSuite TE is a hosted CMS solution ideal for the needs of small and mid-sized publishers or organizations who are stepping into content management for the first time. We have packaged the popular features and function of our industry-leading solution and made it easily accessible and affordable.

RSuite CMS Standard Edition (SE)

RSuite SE is the perfect solution for mid-size publishers and media companies that demand the full feature-set of an enterprise solution without the price tag. RSuite SE manages the full lifecycle of content from creation to packaging and distribution. RSuite SE is a scalable CMS that can serve as a central repository for all of your content, provide significant automation through workflow, and package and distribute content to targeted licensing partners or other platforms.

RSuite CMS Enterprise Edition (EE)

RSuite EE is a full featured CMS that scales to terabytes of content and thousands of users. If you are looking for an industrial strength CMS to leverage your investment in MarkLogic, RSuite EE is the CMS you need. Why build on top of MarkLogic when you can install and be running in hours with RSuite EE? Trusted by some of the world’s most recognized global publishers, RSuite EE provides the framework to run your entire publishing operation.

Interested in seeing a demo? Click the demo request button under the product that best describes your company's needs. We'd love to hear from you!

I was recently reading Dorothy Hoskins' provocative LinkedIn thread on Adobe's embrace of the magazine market at the expense of the educational publishing market and it made me think. So, the options covered in this thread are to work with Adobe by adding requests to their product wish list or have IDPF front an industry request to support merging standards, assuming EDUPUB rather than a better version of ePub is a standard worth sponsoring.

The real question is whether InDesign provides the capability of producing derivative structures that support different standards. It's not looking that way, not now. Maybe production editorial folks in ed publishing houses will embrace other options, like batch pagination systems as an alternative to InDesign. Or use off-shore vendors to force feed *ML through a few manual conversion steps to make ePub files. This push and pull between the making systems like InDesign and the market demands for multiple file formats from a single source puts production and editorial managers in a challenging position.

What's missing from this thread is how Component Content Management Systems (CCMS) fit in, where in the workflow they add value. As a CMS software vendor for some ten years, we at RSI, makers of RSuite CMS, see the movement from IT-based CMS systems, XML repositories with some workflow added, to robust publishing systems supporting a variety of editorial and production workflows.

Enter DITA For Publishers, a standard which RSuite supports which provides the extensibility publishers do and will need to connect editorial, production and the market demands for multiple file formats from a single-source. Click here for our DITA For Publishers White Paper.